I often read blog posts about how stretched teachers are to facilitate authentic learning and in particular inquiry based learning. Sadly, I tend to agree with much of what is posted and overall I think there is relative incongruence in schools between theory and practice. However, in an attempt find a more positive spin, I would like to share a “time-space” saver that recently worked for me in the classroom.
By utilising the HEADLINES strategy I was able to build on what kids had learned through their research and thus support the continuity of their inquiries. Again, I found it to be an excellent routine for using during the “sorting out” phase of inquiry; in particular it served as a bridge between “going further” or returning to “finding out.” Here is how I framed the routine…
As a follow on from GEN/SORT/CONN/ELAB, for homework I asked students to use a google doc to collaboratively create three headlines that captured the essence of their understanding of the guiding question. To gamify this a little, the students were told they would have to present one headline (chosen by the audience) and defend their headline through 5 “why questions” in a game the student’s nicknamed the “5 wise why’s.” (The 5 Why’s is a Kath Murdoch inquiry strategy I adapted). We further authenticated the activity by tagging it as a formative check in for understanding; presentations were peer assessed using the rubric for understanding that we had developed at the beginning of the exhibition.
Here are 6 thoughts that resonated with me after the experience…
- Inquiry is not dependent on planning lots of exciting activities, it is more authentic when you work with what the children bring to the table.
- Providing regular contexts for students to pause and share their learning creates more opportunities for feedback.
- Using this routine during the sorting out phase of inquiry creates a tangible bridge between “going further” or returning back to “finding out.”
- Valuing students’ independence in their thinking can help to build a sense of community and endeavour.
- Being transparent about formative assessment builds the capacity for students metacognitive development.
- It is important to evaluate the relationship between students’ understanding of the big picture in relation to the factual, content knowledge.